All Confederate Flags Must be Burned

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
writerbuddha
david-talks-sw

I'd say where the dissonance really starts, when it comes to the portrayal of the Jedi in more recent Star Wars stories, is the perception of what the Prequels are about.

They're not about the Jedi.

George Lucas said over and over that they're about:

  1. How a democracy turns into a dictatorship, we see this in the background of the films, as the Republic descends into becoming the Empire.
  2. That first theme is then paralleled with a second theme: how a good kid becomes a bad man. We see this in the more character-driven and personal exploration of Anakin’s fall to the Dark Side.
image
image
image

The Prequels’ focus is on Anakin and the Republic, these films are not primarily about the fall of the Jedi. In fact, I’d argue they aren’t about the Jedi at all!

And when you look at the original backstory, you’ll notice that it also primarily focuses on:

  1. The political subplot of the Republic’s downfall and Palpatine becoming the Emperor.
  2. Anakin’s turn and his betrayal of the Jedi. 

So, there too… the Jedi themselves aren’t really that big a part of the Prequels’ original idea. They aren't mentioned much, beyond their trying to save the Senate and getting wiped out.

The Star Wars movies aren't about the Jedi, they're about Anakin and Luke, they're about Obi-Wan and Padmé and Han and Leia, the Rebellion vs the Empire, the fall of the Republic.

They're not about Ben and Yoda and Mace and Ki-Adi and Plo Koon and Shaak Ti and Luminara.

Just like Harry Potter isn't about Dumbledore and McGonagall. Just like the Lord of the Rings isn't about Gandalf.

On a functional level, the Jedi are:

But that's about it.

However, if you ask today’s fans and Star Wars creatives, most will say the Prequels are about the fall of the Jedi Order.

This is a take shared by a big chunk of the fandom, including various filmmakers, authors, and executives involved with Star Wars, so much so that the time period the Prequel films cover has now been redubbed by Lucasfilm as the “Fall of the Jedi era”.

image
image

Which leaves us with a question... why? Why the dissonance?

Keep reading

george lucas jedi order star wars
gffa
gffa

image

Kind of quietly dying at this, because it has the potential to be so funny, like the sheer amount of hilarious "ohhhh I recognize that fucking garbage combination Master Tiira created for himself and then taught to his poor padawan" ribbing that Jedi would give each other, only like more polite.

Some Jedi is watching the Padawans duel each other and sees a particular combo and makes a face. "Master, is some thing wrong?" "Ah, no, Padawan, only that that that move seemed familiar. I do believe you must be Master Tiira's Padawan, I recognize that.... particular style of his that he's passed to you." He absolutely means "that fucking garbage combo" and Tiira will know it.

Later, Master Tiira hears it and only says, "It may not have been the most elegant, that's true, but at least I didn't try to combine all seven forms into one move and land on a particularly delicate bit of anatomy, but oh I'm sure that's just a random example I have thought up just now, certainly nothing Saavin would have done. I do hope that you never tell that poor Padawan of his about any such thing." (Saavin absolutely did and has no business criticizing anyone else's lightsaber combos.)

jeff22003

Yeah. It’s Canon. A little past 1:00 in.

And Criminally underused.

jedi order lightsaber forms star wars Youtube
nobodysuspectsthebutterfly
gay-jesus-probably

Hello everybody with summer fast approaching here is your regular reminder that:

  • Everyone needs to wear sunscreen
  • SPF 50 is pretty much the best protection you can get, an SPF higher than that will have the same effect
  • Melanin does not protect you from skin cancer
  • Tanning is caused by exposure to ultraviolet radiation
  • Spending the majority of your life receiving regular large doses of UV radiation without any skin protection is a good way to get skin cancer
  • Don't use tanning beds, and don't go sun tanning
  • Wear your fucking sunscreen
gay-jesus-probably

Okay, people are clowning in the replies, so let’s try this again:

Sunburn is an uncomfortable short term problem caused by being out in the sun for too long without sunscreen. Some people are more susceptible to it than others. Melanin does protect you from sunburn, so people with dark skin are less likely to get burned, but also sometimes people just have a natural resistance to sunburn (or lack of resistance) - I’m white as hell, and literally the only time in my life I’ve gotten a sunburn was when I spent a whole day outside in a swimsuit without putting on sunscreen when I was a kid, and all I got was a minor burn across my shoulders. Never experienced that whole ‘peeling’ thing y’all are talking about, sounds super gross and uncomfortable tho. Rip to all the rest of you but i’m different.

Skin cancer is fucking cancer. It has nothing to do with sunburn, apart from both being caused by a lot of unprotected sun exposure. If you have skin, you are at risk of getting skin cancer. I have little to no risk of getting sunburn, but I still wear sunscreen, because I am protecting myself from fucking skin cancer.

If someone is basically immune to sunburn, then that’s awesome, but we still need to use just as much sunscreen as everyone else. Because we can still get skin cancer. Immunity to sunburn is not a sign that you can go easy on the sunscreen. And honestly, if you’ve got dark skin, you should probably be extra paranoid about applying sunscreen, because the majority of information on recognizing skin cancer is meant specifically for recognizing it on white skin. If you’re black/brown, it will probably take you longer to be diagnosed if you get skin cancer. And cancer is one of those things that you want diagnosed and treated very quickly, so you should be extra motivated to not get skin cancer in the first place.

Everyone needs to wear sunscreen. Wear your fucking sun screen.

doctor-wonder

And to all the trans girlies (and everyone of course!) doing laser hair removal please please please wear sunscreen and also probably a nice big hat and maybe even a mask because sun will Fuck You Up if you've had laser recently!

turntechg-ethead

heat exhaustion and heat stroke are also no joke!! keep a close eye on yourself and your piers in times of intense heat, even outside of sun. as a paper white mf whose gone through heat stroke and experiences heat exhaustion easily, i make sure to keep water, electrolytes, and a light snack on me in case i begin to experience symptoms. (fruit, bananas, pickles, are all great snack options!) on top of sun screen, your skin needs to stay hydrated to combat the heat properly.

image
image

stay cool, stay hydrated, stay informed, and wear your sunscreen!!

vaspider

People always tell you to like check what color your pee is to see if you're dehydrated but good luck doing that at a festival or whatever.

The trick that always works for me (idk if this is a universal thing but it works for me) is to look at the pads of my fingers. One of the first things that happens for me when I start to get dehydrated is that the pads of my fingers start to look like they've been in water a little too long - wrinkly-like - because there isn't enough water in me or whatever.

If my fingertips don't look right, it's my first hint to make sure I'm consistently drinking more water until my hands look right again. I'm sure there are other tells that you can find, but that one's mine.

The other thing that I've always been told is that you can only absorb about 8oz of water every 15m, and if you just chug 20 oz of water or whatever, more than half of it will just run right through you. I don't know if that's just a Faire thing that people just tell each other or what, but I find that this helps me remember to drink consistently rather than to ADHD my water intake by forgetting and then chugging a giant bottle of water.

sparkletindi

Since this is a big masterpost of sun safety, I'd like to add the reminder that a whole bunch of brain meds can intensify your heat sensitivity, SSRIs and SNRIs especially but also antipsychotics and stimulants as well. If you've recently started new meds or changed dosages, spend as little time in the direct sun as possible until you know your new tolerances.

Also I can't find it on any of the (bad or i would share them) lists, but some antibiotics make you more prone to sunburn. I know this firsthand. Wear a hat! Scalp sunburn with long hair is the wooooorst.

summer good advice health sun safety sunscreen
gffa
gffa

Disney, hire me as your Attachment Advisor, I will shove so many George Lucas quotes at your producers and writers, I will shove so many context-laden clips from the movies and TCW at your creatives, I will make powerpoint essays about how it's more Buddhist-aligned, not Attachment Theory-aligned, I will cite literally every time attachment has ever been discussed by Lucas AND in the show itself and show you that it's always aligned with fear, possessive feelings, and selfishness, I will do this work for you for free, I can even literally just point you to my Jedi Citations collection, DISNEY, HIRE ME AS YOUR ATTACHMENT ADVISOR, I CAN HELP YOU.

gffa

#isn't that kind of the point?#this takes 100 years before the skywalkers#the jedi are beginning to lose their grip on what their own philosophy is and it's making them too detached from the galaxy#the slow creep begins (via @lamaenthel)

Perhaps that's what they're going for in the show (personally, I think it's just people not going with the Buddhist definition), but it doesn't really play out with the prequels Jedi as they actually are in the foundational canon for them. Plus, all of George Lucas' commentary is about how attachment is tied to possession, fear, selfishness, and it's in the context of explaining what he means when he uses that word in the prequels.

Further, every single instance of the Jedi using the word "attachment" in the movies and TCW (which are George Lucas' Star Wars) it's in that same exact context. Every single time it's brought up, the context of what the Jedi are saying is that attachment is wanting someone/something so desperately that you are afraid to live without them that you'll sacrifice any number of other people to keep it. Every single one of those issues is tying attachment back to what attachment means in a more Buddhist-aligned sense.

Obi-Wan specifically says in TCW, when he goes to talk to Anakin after he beat the hell out of Rush Clovis, it's not that they're not allowed (romantic feelings), they're natural. Further, George Lucas explicitly said, "If [Anakin had] been taken in his first year and started to study to be a Jedi, he wouldn’t have this particular connection as strong as it is and he’d have been trained to love people but not to become attached to them." in the Attack of the Clones commentary. The Jedi of the prequels would have trained Anakin to love people.

The Jedi of the prequels very much understood their philosophy, that attachment was specifically about clinging on to something out of fear and at the cost of other people (and yourself), that it's not the same thing as love. It's fandom and later content that came later that's trying to rewrite it, but if we stick with just Lucas' Star Wars, then the Jedi train people to love without attachment, the Jedi do love.

lamaenthel

Oh yes I'm definitely with you there (I've written an embarrassingly large number of gen fics about the Disaster Trio to prove it lmfao) Like Anakin said in aotc, compassion is central to a Jedi's life. You must love everyone in the galaxy unconditionally, be prepared to sacrifice everything for someone you have never met, your whole life is devoted to love and the protection of life. It's at the core of what a Jedi is. That's proven by Osha running back to save that one dickhead who immediately stole the escape pod, by Indara leaving herself exposed to protect the bartender. The code is like an itch, their compassion leaves a trail etc etc. My original point is mainly that by the end of the war, the Jedi are starting to lose that compassion as demonstrated by Trace and Rafa: I cannot think of anything less compassionate than telling two girls whose parents were just creamed in the collateral damage of your high speed chase that sorry, I had to make a choice about who would die, but don't worry bc the Force will be with you bye! And yeah that's a really on the nose example, but it's the big one because it's the one that's used to really prop up the "The Jedi are losing their way" message in s7. And Ahsoka calls out the politicking when she goes back right to Obi-Wan's face, and although the Jedi have been backed into this corner by Palps' spiderwebbing they were slipping before that. The people they are supposed to protect have lost faith in them and they are losing themselves even before the war, relying on dogma and playing politics over following the will of the Force. It's why Qui-Gon didn't join the council, right?

I honestly think it's a bit of both here—I really hope they're not going down a full anti-Jedi thing, I feel like they're building up to a really bad accident that happened on Brendok the four Jedi covered up and not some horrible, purposeful act—but because this is the "end" of the High Republic era, that politics over people mentality is starting to seep in. Not for everyone, the Jedi aren't and have never been a monolith, but they're losing their grip a bit and in my opinion this is where it's starting.

gffa

Haha, so much does come down to how we each react to things. I'm not trying to overwrite anyone else's reactions, but we definitely had vastly different reactions to Rafa's story! I mean, yes, I know what Filoni probably wanted me to take away from it, but what I saw was a story from a very hurt young woman but the events were:

Luminara making a point to go back just to talk to Rafa and check on her, that Luminara is a Jedi, not a social worker, what was she supposed to do? Be a Jedi and all of the rest of the government's support system, too? Was she supposed to be a Republic child services agent? Was she supposed to be Coruscant's housing relief aid? And saying "the Force will be with you" isn't a meaningless platitude coming from a Jedi in Star Wars, it's one of the most central well-wishes and treated as something said with respect! I don't blame Rafa for her reaction, she was in a terrible place and she's a young girl who deserves all the sympathy in the world. But even in her story, what I heard was a Jedi going back to check in on her after she had a to make a horrible choice, and not being all things to all people, that she couldn't magically fix Rafa's problems.

And with Ahsoka, even she says that she's not being fair in her accusations, like what are they supposed to do? Drop the trillions of people in danger on Coruscant when Dooku and Grievous were attacking the heart of the Republic, to go wage yet another war on Mandalore? Those lives on Coruscant don't matter? They were fighting in the war because the Separatists weren't just fighting for independence, they were carpet bombing civilian homes, they were setting up slave empires again, they were using biochemical warfare experiments on planets, they had to be stopped. Joining in the war at all is to be drawn into politics, even as hard as they work to say, no, it's your job to govern (like they do with Riyo Chuchi when she wants the Jedi to negotiate for her, Obi-Wan says, senator, it's you who must lead your people) and it's the people's job to hold leaders accountable (this is what Ahsoka teaches to the cadets on Mandalore) and they do their best with that, like how many times do we see them pushing for anything from Palpatine, only for Yoda to be turned down and go, "Well, that went about as well as usual." or for Mace to desperately try to save the Zillo beast and get railroaded or for Shaak to try to get Fives to the Jedi only to be run right over?

And what dogma are they relying on, that's not like "don't kill unarmed people" or "the dark side is bad"? What will of the Force are they not following and what scenes are we talking about that show the Force isn't being listened to? Attack of the Clones makes a point that the Jedi can't perceive things as clearly as they once could because the Force itself has been darkened by everything in the galaxy, which isn't something the Jedi did, so I don't think it's fair to blame them for the lights in the galaxy going out when they've been doing the same things they've always been doing, you know?

(Qui-Gon didn't join the Council because he wanted to focus on his relationship with the Force, which is admirable in many ways, but he had a chance to enact some of the changes he wanted in the Jedi Order, to have more sway about seeing those changes happen, and turned it down because he didn't want to give up teaching Obi-Wan and wanted to focus on his own thing. Which, fair enough, but I don't think it's particularly "best Jedi ever" to say, no, I could help out with the things I wanted done, but I'm gonna leave that to you guys and go do whatever I want instead. 😂 I'm being tongue in cheek about that, obviously, but.)

And I'm not saying the Jedi were perfect, they were drawn into a situation where more people had lost faith in them and they were fighting in a horrible war, but that's because everyone would die if they didn't (Lucas' words, even!) and they were expected to be All Things To Everyone in the galaxy, they were held up as this idea of how they should be able to fix everything, even things that were completely not their role at all, and when they couldn't magically end the war, people blamed it on them because they were the ones trying to fight it, instead of the galaxy itself doing much of anything. As Obi-Wan says in TCW, "If the rest of the galaxy stood up in this war, it would have been over long ago."

You're possibly right about what the point of Headland's ideas are, but my counterpoint is: I think she's wrong about the actual content of the movies and the actions of the Jedi, what people say about them versus what they themselves actually do. They were in a no-win position, that's the dilemma ("Are they going to stick with their moral rules and all be killed, which makes it irrelevant, or do they help save the Republic?" --George Lucas), that what they were supposed to be was corrupted by being drafted into the war, being forced to be soldiers instead of peacekeepers, but that the alternative was worse, and they were still doing their best in a galaxy that wasn't providing any other paths out of there, because they were never going to just let people die.

Their entire reason for everything they did was still compassion for people, even as they were dying by the dozens and there just weren't enough Jedi left to do more than barely hold the line in the war that would have killed so, so many more without them. Any politics they do aren't for their own gain, it's for the gain of others, and when I look around our own world and how "political" everything has become, I think maybe everyone in the galaxy should be more political, because people are politics.

star wars lumi.txt jedi order the acolyte the acolyte spoilers meta long post attachment sw negativity
bluecichlid
speedlimit15

image

why didn’t gandalf just carry the ring to mordor himself with these tongs

speedlimit15

like i’m picturing him being really careful and looking at it and carrying it exactly like this while walking or riding through the woods and across rivers and up mountains and through valleys and he doesn’t drop it even once except at the very end where he tidily drops it into the volcano. frodo sam and the crew and even gollum wholly undisturbed. sauron can’t find him bc of the meditative aura surrounding him which is generated by his immense focus on not dropping it

derinthescarletpescatarian

World's most tense egg and spoon race

green-great-dragon

image

this somehow became the funniest thing on earth in my head and I had to draw it so

jeff22003

Youtube
bluecichlid
lunalovegouda

Those people who constantly reblog your stuff but you never really talk:

image
justforthearticles

I do notice my regulars. You guys are the best.

wishful-thinkment

“Regulars” makes me feel like a bar-tender…

Wiping down my dash at the end of an evening, I see your read-more, over-hear your rant in the tags, so I pour you a drink.

“…what’s troubling you, kid?”

trailofdesire

It’s nine o’clock on a Saturday
As the regular crowd tumbls by
There’s an old fandom queen blogging next to me
And her little gray tags catch my eye

She says tumblr I’m feeling like shit today
can you send me some posts for a smile
can we talk about slash, can you fill up my dash
so I won’t have to think for a while

Laa dahdah didee dah
La dahdah didee dah dadum

Fill up my dash, you’re my followers
Fill it with pictures and fic
Yeah we’re all in the mood for some memery
And occasional pictures of dick

theragnarokd

Now Jill is a centaur novelist
And she writes of her girlfriend and wife
She reblogs from Toni, who’s in My Little Pony,
And probably will be for life.

As the staff implements wretched changes
And we think of how aliens bone
We are writing a lot about loneliess:
It’s much better than writing alone.

kestrel337

AND sometimes we blog about politics

And sometimes we blog with a beer

And when I proudly boast that I’m older than most, 

They say ‘gross, what are YOU doing here’. 

journeyers-scrapbook

*wild applause!!

dduane

When one of the classics crosses your dash, what can you do…? 😄

wendynerdwrites
radiofreederry

image
lordnot

Yes, such a claim makes him look like a small-minded piece of shit. To us. But we still shouldn't help Musk create revisionist history.

Musk bought Twitter because he fucked around and found out. He wanted to fuck with Twitter's stock price by feigning interest in buying it. Since that's illegal, he was then cornered into actually buying it for an insanely inflated price.

He's a transphobe. He's a bad father. But he's also a fucking idiot.

gamer-crow

This. Please remember that he committed blatant market manipulation by not disclosing that he owned shares of Twitter when he was fucking with the stock market. The SEC was watching him very closely already, and so when the cost became more than what the entire company was worth, he had no choice. Remember when he had his gaggle of lawyers try to get him out of it by saying Twitter didn't disclose all of the information? That wasn't Twitter, it was him trying desperately to get out of a purchase he didn't want in the first place.