All Confederate Flags Must be Burned

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
smhalltheurlsaretaken
justsimplymeagain

What would Satine Kryze think of these characters: 

Din Djarin

and

Boba Fett

crcgeneralwandsmith

She might like Din quite a bit but I think she wouldn’t know what to do with Boba. Especially given who his father is.

mandalor-din

Karen…… that’s the vibe I get sorry

crcgeneralwandsmith

Bo-Karen

mandalor-din

She’s gonna play nice when meeting them and then when they are out of earshot she’ll tell her assistants to make sure they don’t sleep in the palace lest they leave fleas

crcgeneralwandsmith

image

Originally posted by quicksilvermad

Little does she know but Boba and Fennec have been painstakingly sifting for sand fleas for a month and they’ve turned them loose in Kryze’s room.

mandalor-din

Hope you get some cream for that itch bitch 😈🖕🏾

crcgeneralwandsmith

!” Boba cackles as he locks her in.

crc-commandalore-cody

Satine, later that night: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA KRIFF

corvusian

imo the fandom hatred of satine feels kinda… like right-wing garbage? like yeah we see satine rejecting the warrior aspect of mandalorian culture… but surely warfare and violence isn’t the only aspect of mandalorian culture? do we see anything that says that satine is doing other things to crush mandalorian culture? 

people bring up the absence of mando’a… but mando’a has never been used on-screen by even death watch or din’s covert. there’s no indication it’s present in current canon. 

mandalorian culture may hinge on a warrior aspect, but is that worth preserving for culture’s sake? is there anything inherently wrong with a pacifist movement rising up to discourage needless death? obviously, star wars frames pacifism as weakly as possible, as a strawman designed to be torn apart in favor of well-intentioned people with guns and laser swords to fight the bad people with guns and laser swords. 

satine is murdered by maul. her entire character existed to be a “will they or won’t they” counterpart to obi-wan, incapable of standing on her own narratively. this is most obvious in her murder, which is a tragedy for obi-wan rather the loss of satine’s life being a tragedy in and of itself. 

most fanfiction revolving around the mandalorians, especially obi-wan/jango pairings, take an actively negative approach to satine, adding onto her canonical pacifism and snootiness the more explicitly hateful qualities of usurper, killer of culture, and, sometimes, abusive ex. it’s almost like satine is built up as hateful to be less of a threat to the obi-wan/jango ship. (I personally don’t pair satine and obi-wan, just pointing this out)

I wonder how much of the hate directed at satine (and her sister, who doesn’t have that pacifist ideology) is because she’s one of the only notable female mandalorians that isn’t from disney rebels. 

the hate towards satine reads to me like conservative attachments to “traditional values”, militarism, and outright misogyny.

I have not read star wars books that may have more information regarding what satine’s government is like. I do know that satine’s government is uncomfortably all human white blond and blue-eyed, but we don’t exactly get a more diverse glimpse of the other mandalorian factions, and the death watch is led by a human blond-haired blue-eyed man. if there really was a problem about diversity in satine’s government, wouldn’t that be a talking point to bring up in the show?

duchess-of-mandalore

My apologies to my Satine-loving followers for having to endure many of the responses on this thread, but I wanted to thank @corvusian​ for being willing to offer a different view than the people above and expand on all the points they made:

1. Violence is certainly not the only aspect of Mandalorian culture. And Satine herself literally is given a line showing that she prioritizes, appreciates, and cultivates non-violent Mandalorian tradition. 

image

2. Blaming Satine for a Mandalore that doesn’t speak Mando'a is an example of attributing an out-of-universe creative decision to the in-universe fictional character (a recurring theme with her character).

Mando'a is not really present in The Clone Wars, but it was never meant to be a statement about Satine. Instead, it’s likely that Mando'a was avoided because of the (understandable) bad blood between Karen Traviss, the original creator of the language, and the creators of the show, when George Lucas wanted to tell stories about pacifist Mandalore that effectively went against Karen’s novels.

However, Mando'a is not completely absent from the show. In Season Two, “The Mandalore Plot,” we hear a couple lines of Concordian Mando'a. Again, likely because of a desire to distance themselves from Karen’s language, the Mando'a that we hear in the episode is basically gibberish, both in terms of grammar and vocabulary. 
(There was some legitimate Mando'a that was eventually used in Star Wars Rebels, so perhaps something changed after Disney acquired the rights to Star Wars, but that’s just my speculation.) 

 But you know who is the one named character who speaks the language in TCW? Satine Kryze. And she speaks it to the Death Watch bomber who tried to kill her, as a way to comfort and honor him – a traditionalist warrior – as he is dying. So the idea that she was somehow suppressing the use of Mando’a is ridiculous to me.

image

3. People who like to say that Satine committed cultural genocide failed to consider the fact that canonically, Death Watch was a small splinter group, and the rest of the Mandalorian population seems to have generally supported Satine and the New Mandalorians. 

This isn’t explored in great detail on screen, however it was explored in the junior novelization Darth Maul: Shadow Conspiracy. Basically, the book sets out that Satine rallied the Mandalorian warlords to the pacifist cause, but she never forced it on any of them. Instead, it’s set out that the vast majority of the clan leaders were simply tired of fighting, and they chose peace.

image

 In Season 2, “Voyage of Temptation,” Obi-Wan says that “a civil war killed most of Satine’s people.” Is it so audacious to consider that even a people that honored war may at times look at the destruction war has caused and decide to choose a different way? 

image

(Beyond that, we don’t even have time to get into the fact that not only did Satine exile the warriors who refused to accept peace to Concordia, arguably the most habitable planetary body in the Mandalore system, but she also gave them their own independent governor, so they weren’t technically even ruled by her.)

Further, on screen, what we do see is full support for Satine from the Mandalorians in Sundari. Satine rules by the will of her people, and when they turn against her, she also steps down at the will of the people. She knows that her authority comes from them, not because she holds the Darksaber or has killed the previous leader in battle (hooray for democracy!).

Literally, when her prime minister asks if they should attempt to stop the Death Watch, she says “How can we? The people are on their side now” and lets herself be removed and imprisoned without bloodshed (in the book, she says that she knows this will lead to her death)

image

4. As to the final comment about the homogeneity of Satine’s Mandalore, this is another instance of fans taking an out-of-universe production decision and applying it to Satine, in-universe fictional character. 

The Mandalorians were designed as generally white, blond, and blue-eyed because George and Dave wanted space-Vikings, so they gave them a stereotypical Scandinavian look. 

The entire population looks like this because crowd design and animation takes tons of work and time that the designers and animators did not have. That’s why if you look at the crowds, you notice that all of the characters are basically the same few designs with their features mixed-and-matched. 

image

But you know who also is completely white, blond, and blue-eyed? 

Death Watch, save for the exception of Bo-Katan Kryze (ironically, if Satine is in favor of some sort of blond/Aryan Mandalore, her family is the biggest offender considering her sister and nephew are both redheads)

image
image
image

This was not a statement on race. It was simply the design that they gave to all Mandalorians in this stage of Star Wars animation production. 

Thankfully, in Rebels and in The Siege of Mandalore, they began to vary the look of the Mandalorians (both Death Watch and the Sundarians), indicating that the intention was never to have them all be white.

Ultimately, I don’t care if people dislike Satine. What I do have a problem with is when people justify that view by saying that she’s supposed to be a villain-esque figure, when that is completely different from what’s actually shown onscreen. 

racefortheironthrone

Anonymous asked:

Why do you hate anti-slavery characters? That the creators specify they are anti-slavery certainly argues against the idea of trying to deny it existed. What it seems they want in the characters is an underdog on the losing side, usually one who has lost everything, and they are acknowledging slavery is evil by not having the hero approve it. I can see hating the benevolent slave owner/inheritor, but IDK what's the problem with the other type.

racefortheironthrone answered:

You have wildly misinterpreted my argument, and you’ve done so in a way that actually rises to being mildly offensive because of how you’ve let yourself get duped by the Lost Cause mythology. Because there is nothing anti-slavery about the trope of the Confederate Protagonist.

Let me spell it out plainly for you: the trope that a Confederate veteran didn’t fight because of slavery is part of the broader Lost Cause myth promulgated after the Civil War by groups like the Daughters of the Confederacy, United Daughters of the Confederacy, the Sons of Confederate Veterans that denied that the Confederacy explicitly fought for the cause of slavery.

By pushing the false narrative that Confederate soldiers were not fighting for slavery, these white supremacist groups sought to trick Americans into believing that Confederate soldiers (including both folk heroes like Jesse James and generals like Robert E. Lee or Stonewall Jackson) were noble (indeed, superior) warriors who fought to defend hearth, home, and the lofty constitutional principle of “state’s rights.”

In reality, among soldiers in the Army of Northern Virginia, “volunteers in 1861 were 42 percent more likely to own slaves themselves or to live with family members who owned slaves than the general population.” Confederate soldiers fought for slavery becayse their society was built on slavery, they viewed the Union as a threat to their social order which was built on slavery, Confederate armies systematically enslaved or re-enslaved free black people, and Confederate soldiers repeatedly massacred black soldiers.

And the famous individuals who inspired those Western tropes, like Jesse James? Well, in reality, Jesse James was part of a notorious family of pro-slavery terrorists who participated in the Lawrence Massacre during Bleeding Kansas, and James himself participated in the Centralia Massacre during the Civil War. After the war when he became an outlaw and bank robber, James’ gang targeted Republicans for assassination or robbery, James himself wrote letters to the newspapers denouncing Republican politicians, and the James gang used Klan hoods during robberies.

jedimaesteryoda

And if they wanted to look underdog Southern figures who were outlaws and fought in the Civil War, there’s the figure of Henry Berry Lowry. 

image

He was a mixed race Lumbee in Robeson County whose family had guns when North Carolina had declared it illegal for nonwhites to own guns, and originally started out by helping free men of color avoid being forcibly rounded up by the Confederate Home Guard and conscripted to build Fort Fisher with the work often being dangerous and the wages poor. 

He later killed a Confederate conscription officer James Brantley Harris who conscripted two of his family members. Of course, Barnes also allegedly mistreated the women of his family and murdered his cousin Jarman, who he thought was one woman’s boyfriend. Then, fearing retaliation from the Lowry family, Harris arrested Jarman’s brothers on trumped up charges of desertion when they were granted leave and beat them both to death to preempt any attempts at vengeance. Henry apparently shot him when he was riding in a buggy when there was already a warrant out for Harris’s arrest.

His father and brother were later arrested by the Confederate Home Guard for illegally having firearms and possession of stolen goods in their home. They gave the Lowrys a kangaroo court trial, and executed them by firing squad.

From there he formed the Lowry Gang, a multi-racial band made up of Native Americans, African-Americans and whites to wage guerilla war against the Confederacy up to and including working with Union soldiers who escaped Confederate prison camps. 

He did rob people, but atypical among robbers, his victims could avoid being robbed if they could prove to be too poor to afford it. They would also return stolen horses and carriages after they no longer needed them. Even after the Civil War, he committed many robberies and murders largely aimed at the wealthy landowning class, and at times even shared their loot with the poor and doled out corn. This brought on Robin Hood comparisons.

After the war, he opposed the Democratic conservative power structure that tried to reassert white supremacy and political dominance with his gang killing figures supporting that establishment. One was Reuben King, a man who lost his reelection for sheriff, but refused to take the loss as the local whites dubiously said the election was fraudulent and still accorded him the authority. They targeted him both because he was the wealthiest man in the county and he had a reputation for racial discrimination. The authorities were largely unable to stop Lowry because he enjoyed the support of the non-white population of Robeson County who sympathized with him.

Henry was arrested at his wedding reception, and his cohorts smuggled a file into his cell (through a cake his wife baked according to oral tradition), and he filed through the bars and escaped. The authorities later held the wives of the Lowry band in prison as hostages. Henry sent a letter saying to let them go or "the bloodiest times will be here than ever was before—the life of every man will be in jeopardy." 

They let their wives go.

He disappeared after 1872 with different tales as to what happened to him though none of the Confederate militias ever managed to capture him.

racefortheironthrone

Now that’s an outlaw I can get behind!

spacetimeninjapirate
looney-mooney

Actors and Animators should go on strike next tbh. Especially cgi animators. Put the fear back into Hollywood

everettkross

Animators? Yes. Actors? If youre talking ppl like RDJ or Jamie Lee Curtis or what have you. They have more than enough fucking money. Take a look at one production cost and see how much these people are paid.

looney-mooney

My dad is an actor/playwrite. He has to constantly search for new gigs to make ends meet, and even then ends up doing retail or lyft or doordash a lot of the time between gigs.

And my parents don't live in a huge house in New York or LA, it's a tiny townhouse in a really small city. My mom's the one who really pays the mortgage with her events organizer and house manager jobs at local theatres, and even then they struggle to afford living expenses. They used food stamps when I was a kid - not every month, but enough that I see it as a normal thing to do.

And when he does get gigs, especially like big tv gigs, working conditions are CRAP. He nearly got severe hypothermia once for having to jump in a freezing cold river in early winter from 11pm-3am, repeatedly, for a shot they didn't even end up USING.

Scheduling is abysmal, overtime is never properly compensated for, the jobs are DANGEROUS (mostly on a physical fatigue level), and work is contractual by nature. Are there some contracts that are ridiculously good? Yes, that's how contract-based work tends to happen for a lucky few.

But getting a contract like that is like winning the lottery, and even then they can be really exploitative if you don't have a kickass agent and/or a really good entertainment lawyer. There aren't really steady 9-5 full time acting jobs with benefits the way there are with other jobs. It's difficult to get any gigs in the first place, I cannot emphasize enough how much it is a constant job search.

And that's not even getting into the horrendous conditions and disrespect for voice actors. Actors should ABSOLUTELY go on strike

dakregor

image
zekedms

I fucking hope RDJ and Will Smith and everyone on top strike too. You want a real impact? Let's see what happens when top names refuse to work until the people on the bottom are compensated fairly too.

Being able to pretend it's just some uppity character actors or commercial actors lets studios distract. When there's no star for the best blockbuster to be, they can't ignore the demands.

crazyneutral

The top-paid members of an industry strike in support of better working conditions for their coworkers, not for more money. Neil Gaiman and George RR Martin aren't striking because they want or expect to be paid more, they're striking to support the entire rest of their industry because they care about it.

bundibird

Not to mention, even the big names are often treated like absolute shit.

Kate Winslet nearly got hypothermia on multiple occasions whilst filming titanic because, despite the fact that the whole thing was happening on a carefully controlled set and thus could have the water at whatever temperature he wanted, James Cameron wanted to take the "acting" out of acting and he had the water set to be as cold as possible without it being frozen. He called it method acting. He didn't bother to see if Kate could ACT as though the water was one-degree above freezing; he just called it right from the go and was like, hey, what if I make my lead actress spend several days getting in and out of BORDERLINE FREEZING WATER, so that it will look realistic.

Her chattering teeth and whole body tremors? Yeah, not acting. That was her body on the edge of actual real life hypothermia.

And look at the way they treat men these days with making them fast and dehydrate to the point of collapse, just so the director can get two seconds worth of a shot where their muscles and veins are all bulging unnaturally.

When he was filming Logan (I think it was Logan) Hugh Jackman literally DID collapse. One of the scenes of him all bare-chested and muscly and roaring angrily? Is a much shorter scene than it was supposed to be, because that's all they managed to get out of him before he LITERALLY PASSED OUT.

And these are the big name lead actors who are getting treated like this. If THEY are being treated so appallingly, what hope in hell do the smaller actors have of not being worked into the ground?

YES, the actors should go on strike. Yes, including the biggest-name stars who've never been mistreated and who get the cushiest most comfortable jobs. They should go on strike too because they support the improved conditions and pay for all those in their industry who ARENT treated well. Which is most of them.

racefortheironthrone
iconuk01

What the actual hell?

A northern California restaurant chain will have to pay more than $140,000 in back pay after it ran a “shameless” wage theft scheme that involved a fake priest who had workers confess to any sins they committed while on the clock.

The owners and operators of Taqueria Garibaldi, a Sacramento-based restaurant chain, are also accused of threatening workers and fabricating timesheets as part of an effort to obstruct an investigation into the business. The US Department of Labor previously found that the company illegally denied workers overtime pay.

The labor department launched an investigation into Taqueria Garibaldi in 2021, at which point the business owners instructed employees to tell investigators that they worked 40 hours a week, were provided two days off and 30-minute breaks, and were paid only with checks, court records show.

Workers were also prohibited from using their usual digital attendance tracker and were instead told to write that they were only working 40-hour weeks on paper timesheets that were then processed by a third-party payroll company.

Employees did as they were told under threat of retaliatory actions such as firing and holding immigration statuses over their heads, according to the labor department.

racefortheironthrone

I’ve heard of a lot of evil shit that happens with wage theft, and the threat of la migra is absolutely standard, but simony is a new one.

boringisnotbad

Technically I don't think it's simony (the sale and purchase of Church offices for money), but yeah, abusing employees like this is horrible.

racefortheironthrone

Yeah, I wasn’t quite sure what precisely to call impersonating a priest for money as part of a conspiracy to rob people, and simony was the closest thing I could think of. 

I dunno, maybe @apocrypals​ might have an idea. 

poorshadowspaintedqueens
uncleromeo

if you don't do anything else today,

Please have a moment of silence for the people who were killed instead of freed when news of emancipation finally reached the furthest corners of the american south.

have another moment for the ledgers, catalogs, and records that were burned and the homes that were destroyed to hide the presence of very much alive and still enslaved people on dozens of plantations and homesteads across the south for decades after emancipation.

and have a third moment for those who were hunted and killed while fleeing the south to find safety across the border, overseas, in the north and to the west.

black people. light a candle, write a note to those who have passed telling them what you have achieved in spite of the racist and intolerant conditions of this world, feel the warmth of the flame under your hand, say a prayer of rememberance if you are religious, place the note under the candle, and then blow it out.

if you have children, sit them down and tell them anything you know about the life of oldest black person you've ever met. it doesn't have to be your own family. tell them what you know about what life was like for us in the days, years, decades after emancipation. if you don't know much, look it up and learn about it together.

This is Juneteenth.

white people CAN interact with this post. share it, spread it.

spacetimeninjapirate
jedi-enthusiast

Something I never really see discussed when people talk about the Tusken Massacre is what Shmi would have wanted Anakin to do, in that situation.

Like, call me crazy, but Shmi absolutely does not strike me as someone who would want to be "avenged" or for her death to be used as a justification for murder of any sort, let alone mass murder and the murder of literal children.

I think, if she ever found out about what Anakin did--what he used her death to justify--I think she'd be horrified. Disgusted.

I think she'd have just about the same reaction as Padme did in RotS when she found out that he had done all of the heinous things he did in that movie for her. She'd hate it!

And I think that's the core of all of Anakin's choices, they're selfish.

So many Anakin apologists like to excuse him committing mass murder and genocide by saying "He was doing it for Shmi/Padme! He was doing it for love!" and like...no he wasn't.

If he was doing it for Padme or for Shmi, then he'd take into account the fact that neither of them wanted/would want him to commit the atrocities he's committing. And the fact that he's not even considering how they might feel about him doing these things, doing them for them, shows that he's not actually doing them for/out of love.

He says he is, but he's not. He's just using them to justify his own terrible, selfish choices.

And some of y'all eat that up.

bbygirl-obi

Popping in to repeat my usual soapbox about how attachment is literally selfish. It is prioritizing how someone makes you feel (Shmi and Padme making Anakin feel good, secure, and loved) over what that person actually wants (Shmi and Padme not wanting innocents, especially children, to be slaughtered). It is centering your own feelings and needs over the other person's agency.

Attachment might be borne from love, but it is incompatible with true, compassionate love. Anakin was so focused on how he felt in that moment that he was not thinking about Shmi as a person at all- he was thinking about her as a thing that had been taken from him, with no wants or desires of its own.

That is the ugliness of the Dark Side. It dehumanizes and dismisses and hurts the very people it claims to "love" most of all.

jedi-enthusiast

^^^

smhalltheurlsaretaken
smhalltheurlsaretaken

for real, imagine the delicious angst if Dooku had given in in that Lost Jedi episode, killed Sidious then and there and come back with Yaddle (assuming everybody was actually written in-character Prequels-wise, and not, you know, made into Filoni's mouthpieces. the man really saw a quasi blank slate of a council member and decided that she didn't even like the council acshually and had just stepped down. incredible.)

Dooku could have prevented everything, without Order 66 in the picture but it wouldn't have been a very happy moment either.

with Sidious dead, at least, the corruption of the Senate might ease up. there'd be no Clone Wars down the line either.

imagine Dooku coming back, trying to stay on his high horse while the crestfallen council asks how he could have let Qui-Gon walk away when he knew it was an actual Sith he'd faced. imagine him trying to put that on them not listening - not listening to speculations, when he could have provided proof but didn't.

imagine the council learning about the baby clones - how many of them were actually created by that point, if any? maybe it's early enough that the Jedi stop it altogether, and feel a sorrow they can't explain.

the look on everybody's faces when they learn Dooku not only let Qui-Gon walk into danger blind but murdered his friend Sifo-Dyas as well. when they learn what the ultimate plan was - their destruction.

where do you even put Dooku after something like that? what do you even say?

macleod
macleod

image

UPS has reached an agreement with the Teamsters union to equip its iconic brown delivery trucks with air conditioning for the first time for new units.

The agreement, announced by UPS on Tuesday, comes as the delivery giant and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters negotiate the terms of a new contract for more than 330,000 U.S. employees. (source)

Unions work, unionize.

jeff22003

Wait…what the fuck? It’s 2023!